Table 14: Summary of comparisons between the Capinota and Mizque survey areas.

 
Period
CAPINOTA
MIZQUE
Differences in total estimated
occupation size?
EIP
significantly larger in Mizque @ 95% c.l.b
MH No
Preferential occupation by
topographic or soil zone?
EIP
No topography/No soil
Piedmont/No soil
MH
Piedmont/No soil
Piedmont/No soil
Increase in percentage of
occupation of soil or
topography zone?
In transition
EIP to MH
Topography Soil zone Topography Soil zone
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
x x x x x x x x x x x x
Increase in Total Estimated
Occupation Size?
In transition
EIP to MH
No
No
Site Location Changes? In transition
EIP to MH
Same locations and two new sites Same site locations and no new sites
Exclusive Local Style occupation in MH? No Yes
Exclusive Tiwanaku style?
No
No